I'm sure I'm not alone in adopting many different roles as I trot along in life trying to figure out what it's all about and how best to stay sane(ish). I've been 'dynamic mum' (come on kids! let's do a page from your work books every day during the holidays and we'll go swimming and cycling every day too!); that one never lasts long.
For many years I was 'career girl' which was fabulous until I found myself being pulled every which way by the demands of motherhood and it came down to the simple fact that something had to go; kids or career. It was a close call.
I'm often 'caring friend', sharing and listening to woes, hopes and dreams. 'Party girl' I have had to scale back a tiny bit as it's taking me longer and longer to recover but I'm bravely working up to the coming Christmas period so that she can have quite a few well deserved outings. I'm sometimes 'seductive wife', well ok, only on birthdays and special occasions - Reader, it would never do to spoil him.
During September I have mostly been, entirely of my own volition, 'perfect wife and mother', yep it's a totally new one on me too. Basically I've chosen not to accept any paid work and have instead concentrated on being around and nurturing my family with love, attention and fresh, home-cooked food EVERY SINGLE DAY.
This unusual (for me) situation came about as a result of several factors, Husband's new job which means that during the week he is largely absent from family life, being one of them. Son is also now in Year 5, which will mean little to those of you who have very young ones or are child-free, but to those in the know, it's a pretty tough academic year for those poor little 9-year-olds with tutoring, homework and expectations piled on daily.
I've also been busy designing and drawing up plans for our Big House Project which is a sizeable extension and remodelling of existing rooms. I love the creative and mathematical process of measuring and drawing but blimey it's hard work. I console myself with the knowledge that while I may not be earning, I'm sure as heck saving us a whole heap of money in architect's fees. Plus I can fiddle around to my heart's content, drawing and re-drawing until I've predicted to the nth degree, how we will want to live for the next umpteen years.
But the whole wrap around nurturing, caring wife/mother role is one that doesn't come easily. I don't feel particularly privileged when anyone needs me on a regular basis, I feel trapped. I enjoy variety and have always been able to flit about doing lots of different things in the course of a day or week, and I'm also accustomed to receiving money and praise for my efforts.
When you're in the home all day every day, the pay and conditions are crap. In my experience nobody particularly thanks you or even notices that you've emptied the dishwasher (again) or tidied up inside that cupboard so that the door will actually shut. I find myself pointing out these small, mind-numbing tasks to anyone who will listen, which is often just the cats.
There are some perks of course. I have been able to exercise properly every day of September, reprising my 'fitness queen' role, something that working in London doesn't allow, and I've caught up with copious friends for coffee and lunch, but if I am to be there at the beginning and end of each day for my loved ones with an imaginatively crafted, healthy, nutritious meal in the oven, well, that all takes time.
When I began this I wasn't sure I would be able to keep it up for a whole month and keep a smile on my face too. But I've surprised myself by taking some pride in my domestic skills and by the effect it seems to have had on the family as a whole. The kids are enjoying the certainty that Mummy will be there to collect them every night and because my presence is felt, the homework is being done with minimum fuss and bother.
Husband departs each morning safe in the knowledge that he will return home to a calm and happy household. He keeps mentioning in a duly respectful and grateful tone (he's no fool that one), how much difference this is making to his work/life balance. Damn it! Why did they have to respond so well? Serious respect to all of you who successfully make this role your own, day in, day out but Reader, despite the obvious advantages to home and happiness I cannot do it forever, something will go bang at some point and it'll probably be me.
My house plans are complete and about to go in for the council's perusal and I'm beginning to feel that unmistakeable twitch, that thirst for adventure and a change of scene. I feel another role fast approaching and you can safely put money on that it will have little to do with dishwashers.
Thursday, 3 October 2013
Tuesday, 24 September 2013
What's in a name?
Well quite a lot as it happens, and a recent name-related
event has led me to question how far we have come, or rather haven’t come, in
the past hundred or so years since the word ‘feminism’ first entered our
lexicon.
It was a bit like a fart in a lift in that nobody wanted to be the first to mention it. It fell to a rather inebriated gentleman to bring up the subject which he did in what I thought was a particularly delicate and sensitive manner. The exchange went something like this:
PB: “***** me! Wouldn’t catch me doing something like that – no way!”
Now isn’t that just so supportive? I must admit we had stolen the march on most of the guests as we'd seen the happy couple just the week before for a pre-wedding celebration (it’s any excuse to pop open a bottle or 3 at our gaff) and they’d told us about the surname decision then. My reaction had been to say well done, open another bottle of fizz and congratulate them on putting the flagstones on yet another step towards true equality. And I meant every word.
My consternation was piqued when two friends recently tied
the knot. They shared over a decade of
history and 3 kids, so you could argue that the marriage bit was just a
formality. But to them it wasn’t; it meant a heck of a lot, especially as one
of them had done it before, only to experience a miserable divorce just a few
years later. So this was the opposite of
a rush-job; meticulously planned with every detail given due thought and
consideration.
The bride isn’t a Brit so the main ceremony took place in
her home town overseas, then they had a wonderful British wedding party so that
all their local friends could celebrate with them. The venue was stunning, the sun shone and the
champagne flowed; Reader it was fab and all the guests agreed that everything was
pretty perfect. Until, that is, towards
the end of the night when the rumour started circulating that the groom had
taken the bride’s surname.It was a bit like a fart in a lift in that nobody wanted to be the first to mention it. It fell to a rather inebriated gentleman to bring up the subject which he did in what I thought was a particularly delicate and sensitive manner. The exchange went something like this:
Pissed bloke: “Oi! I just heard that you’re changing your name
to hers?”
Groom: “That’s right,
I am”
PB: “What the **** d’ya
want to do something like that for?”
Groom (impressively still sporting an engagingly polite
smile): “Well we decided it was easier
for one of us to change, ie me, rather than her and all the kids having to
change theirs. It’s no biggie”PB: “***** me! Wouldn’t catch me doing something like that – no way!”
Now isn’t that just so supportive? I must admit we had stolen the march on most of the guests as we'd seen the happy couple just the week before for a pre-wedding celebration (it’s any excuse to pop open a bottle or 3 at our gaff) and they’d told us about the surname decision then. My reaction had been to say well done, open another bottle of fizz and congratulate them on putting the flagstones on yet another step towards true equality. And I meant every word.
When I got married it didn’t even occur to me to change my
surname. Why would I? It was part of me, no, not just part of me,
it WAS me. Why would I want to suddenly,
at the age of 29, acquire a new identity?
I generously offered to share my surname with my husband-to-be, but he
had similar views to mine where his identity was concerned so we just stayed as
we were. We were married, we knew it and
all our friends and family knew it. I
viewed it as a simple, personal choice that would be respected by all who knew
me, at that time and in the future.
Now I happen to loudly and proudly refer to myself as a feminist
and I always have done. I consider it to
be neither a dirty word nor a complicated one. I believe men and women are equal and should therefore
be treated as such. Neither gender should dominate the other, and from the
moment of birth, the same opportunities should be open to all including later
on, the choice of which name to adopt upon marriage. My kids will parrot “there’s no such thing as
boys’ toys or girls’ colours” because I’ve taught them they can wear what they
like and play with what they like. I’ve
never understood why a parent would automatically bar their child from fifty
per cent of experiences anyway. Bonkers.
If you struggle with the concept of feminism, then the
journalist and author Caitlin Moran neatly sums it up by posing the question: ‘do
you have a vagina?’ and ‘do you want to be in control of it?’ and apparently if
the answer to both questions is ‘yes’ then congratulations, you are a feminist.
Simple huh? Only it’s not apparently.
My first Christmas as a married woman was a revelation when
cards from all our dear friends, many of whom had been at our wedding, began to
plop onto the doormat. Despite everyone
being made aware of the fact that I hadn’t changed my name, I would say that
about seventy per cent of the cards were stubbornly addressed to Mr & Mrs D..... Some of them were old fashioned enough to
write to Mr & Mrs P D.....,
thus not only stripping me of my surname, but of my own initial too. And as we all know, generally speaking who is
it that writes most of the Christmas cards?
Yes, the women.
My new in-laws committed the faux pas too, but somehow I can
forgive more easily the older generation their outdated views, but my peers who
themselves claimed to be believers in equality?
Much harder to accept, especially when I was happy to respect their
choices to take their husband’s surname. I didn’t feel the need to continually address
them by their maiden name just to prove my point.
At the time I felt irrationally upset by what I saw as our
friends’ obstinate reversion to a bygone age where women ‘knew their place’. ‘I’m different! ‘I wanted to shout and
yell ‘I make my own rules! I have my own name! But I calmed down and came to realise it’s
not me, it’s them. It’s other people who
are most disturbed when a woman makes a stand, however small. And I have some experience of making a stand
and refusing to let other people tell me what is and isn’t possible purely
because of my gender.
I’ve spent most of my professional life operating in a man’s
world, first at Halfords, then inside the Ministry of Defence, then as Defence and
Security Producer for the BBC and latterly as a property developer sporting
(pink) steel toe capped boots and hardhat, bossing builders around. At each juncture I’ve had to stand tall and
prove my worth and knowledge as men (and occasionally a few women) tried their
best to talk over me and ignore what I’ve had to say. I guess I must be drawn to the challenge but
I’ve never yearned to be a man, I
love being a woman but being able to choose how I work it.
I’m sure that the less charitable among you are now
concluding that I was probably born with a tad too much testosterone or
something, but let me assure you that I can rock a skirt/blouse/heels combo and
talk kids and home with the best of them.
And no, I don’t shave my face or arms.
Life should be about having the freedom to choose and being
true to who you are and I take my hat off to my newly married friends with
their new (for him anyway) joint surname and I wish them every happiness. After all, he’s only doing what women have
done for millennia and if we’re all truly equal then where is the quandary? I don’t see one and neither should you.
Monday, 16 September 2013
Baby Bumps
Remember that feeling of amazement when the Duchess of
Cambridge appeared from the innards of the Lindo Wing, proudly clutching her
new little baby and looking, to be frank, still pregnant? I could swear that there was a collective
gasp from all of us mothers watching when we clocked that even Kate, perfect,
gorgeous, never-puts-a-foot-wrong, fashionista babe with her ever glossy mane
and sylph-like figure, was a bit like the rest of us after all. I bet if she’d been standing at a bus stop, some dopey but well meaning fellow traveller would have offered her a seat.
My own post-partum humiliation was visited upon me as I
stood in a queue in Boots buying nipple cream or something just as
ghastly. Husband stood to one side with
5-day-old Son in the pram as I suffered the indignity of the woman at the till
asking me when my due date was. I just
remember blurting out “I had it, it’s over there” and pointing numbly at the
pushchair. I don’t really recall much
else of that episode but I quite possibly burst into tears. Up until that point I’d probably been feeling
that I was holding it all together remarkably well, having managed to get up,
shower, dress and make it out of the house, but that one misguided comment
pierced my fragile sense of self like an arrow, such was the overwhelming
feeling of failure at my early attempts at motherhood.
Any fears about how Kate might be coping were safely laid to
rest when she stepped out for her first royal engagement the other night. ‘My flippin’ God’ I breathed as I took in her
silver, shimmering column dress, high sparkling heels, relatively normal sized
boobs and TOTALLY FLAT STOMACH. She
looked, to be frank, like the perfect MILF (look it up) and behaved like a
normal, smiley, contented person, not someone who had given birth just 6 weeks
previously. There’s no way on earth that
someone would mistakenly offer up their seat on the tube for that!
Which brings me nicely to my second post-partum moment of
humiliation (yes you’ve probably guessed that I was on such good terms with my
baby-weight that we couldn’t bear to be parted for quite some time), which took
place some months after the birth of Daughter.
Son was safely at nursery so I succumbed to requests from my work
colleagues to bring the new baby into the office so they could all have a
cuddle.
I duly arrived at Television Centre and found my car parking
space that a kind friend had organised.
Bundling up Daughter in her pushchair I wound my way down the familiar
corridors, past the beloved but grotty tea-bars, feeling the slight apprehension
that comes when you haven’t been somewhere for a long time. I did a quick tour of the vast, open plan BBC
newsroom while the going was good, but when feeding time approached I retreated
to my old office of the world affairs unit where if she started yelling I knew
there was a sound-proof radio booth into which I could scurry.
Daughter was delightedly passed around the world affairs correspondents
and producers who all cooed and fussed in the appropriate manner, and to my
relief, she managed not to be sick on any of them. I wondered what I had been so worried about. I was just getting ready to leave when
another, esteemed correspondent who despite being a household name shall, for
the purposes of this post, remain anonymous, swept in, fresh from the set of
the One o’clock news. After a quick ‘how
are things’ chat, they gestured towards my stomach and coyly (but loudly) asked
“so is that baby number 3 in there then?”
Reader, the silence was deafening. Never have so many computer screens and
documents been examined so forensically by so many people, all of whom longing
to snigger, all of whom admirably managing not to. But did I crumble? Did I burst into tears? Did I heck.
By this time I was quite resigned to the fact that yes, to some I
probably did still look a bit pregnant, but with a baby and a toddler to look
after, quite frankly it was the least of my worries. I finished tucking Daughter in and turned to
face my accuser. “What, this?” I asked, staring them coolly straight in the
eyes “no, I’m just a bit fat”. And with
that I swept out, wearing my dignity like a (maternity sized) cloak. Reader, even though I say it myself, I was
magnificent.
Monday, 9 September 2013
Secrets, lies and war
Watching David Cameron trying to whip up support for the possibility of bombing Syria gives me a strong and uncomfortable sense of deja vu. During the Afghan and Iraq conflicts I was the BBC's Defence Producer, a role which gave me a ringside seat to the political storm and military intervention and aftermath of the two conflicts. Cameron's early recall of Parliament and impassioned speeches, detailing President Assad's many and varied abuses of the Syrian people had more than an echo of Blair 10 years ago, confidently denouncing Saddam and his infamous (and as it so miserably turned out, completely invisible) weapons of mass destruction.
The MPs' rebellion left Cameron defeated and politically impotent, but it made me wonder if our PM wasn't playing a rather clever, longer game. It was kind of obvious, even to the casual observer, that the UK was not going to be heading into military action in the middle east, to use that phrase so beloved of news correspondents "any time soon". After the 12 gory years fighting in Afghanistan and the shorter, but no less blood-stained invasion of Iraq, the public is war-weary. As a nation we simply don't have the stomach for yet another C-17 discharging its cargo of flag-draped coffins at RAF Brize Norton and more recently, RAF Lyneham.
Surely Cameron must have foreseen this? The fact that he appeared to be working to Obama's timetable would have been doubly off-putting for MPs. We like America and the cachet that comes from being a friend, we just don't want to be THE friend anymore. Remember those Blair/Bush love-ins? The back slapping, the lingering looks, the shared belief that God was guiding them personally - pure car-crash TV; nauseating but compulsive viewing.
Whatever your opinions on Cameron, he is not a stupid man. He does not lack judgement, he knows how to read people and situations. So why did he rush the whole vote? I rather wonder whether he actively wanted a way out. By going to the Commons with some intelligence material but not all of it (funny how US Secretary of State John Kerry provided a whole lot more just 2 days later) and lots of tactics but no clear strategy, he was almost inviting a rejection of his motion. Perhaps he wanted to be seen to be doing and saying all the right things to keep Obama onside, while actually maintaining a stance of non-intervention by proxy.
Obama's premise is that military intervention would comprise a few quick surgical strikes to serve as a "shot across the bows" and show Assad that the use of chemical weapons will not be tolerated. Great, but then what? The trouble is with launching any kind of strike is that it doesn't end there and there is no such thing as limited military intervention. That's a bit like saying someone is a 'little bit pregnant'. War, like pregnancy demands to have a beginning, middle and an end. And there will always, always be a lasting legacy to be taken care of.
Rather hilariously it's now the French who are rushing forward to be America's BFF. Anyone remember those 'cheese eating surrender monkeys' jibes from 2003? Or the 'freedom fries' that took the place of French fries in US eateries? How quickly we forget. I don't get the impression that Cameron is feeling remotely threatened by the French and American presidents' sudden closeness, or by Russia's alleged assertion that Britain is a small island that no-one pays any attention to. I reckon that he's (probably rightly) predicting that Syria will go belly up and the further away he is from it, the better to enter the pre-election period of 2014/15.
It's all a gamble. Would military action force the Syrian government to negotiate? Or would it effectively topple Assad thus creating a vacuum and lighting the fuse to the bone-dry tinderbox that is the Sunni, Shi ite, Muslim Brotherhood, Al Qaeda, jihadist cocktail just waiting for the opportunity to control Syria's future? Obama's hope that any attack would form part of a broader strategy to "support rebel forces" and ultimately "allow Syria to free itself", does sound somewhat naïve.
Syria has no credible opposition, there simply isn't an organised, democratic faction ready to step in and take control if Assad goes. That is both the harsh truth and the main stumbling block to any kind of intervention in the murderous, miserable hell-hole that is now Syria.
The MPs' rebellion left Cameron defeated and politically impotent, but it made me wonder if our PM wasn't playing a rather clever, longer game. It was kind of obvious, even to the casual observer, that the UK was not going to be heading into military action in the middle east, to use that phrase so beloved of news correspondents "any time soon". After the 12 gory years fighting in Afghanistan and the shorter, but no less blood-stained invasion of Iraq, the public is war-weary. As a nation we simply don't have the stomach for yet another C-17 discharging its cargo of flag-draped coffins at RAF Brize Norton and more recently, RAF Lyneham.
Surely Cameron must have foreseen this? The fact that he appeared to be working to Obama's timetable would have been doubly off-putting for MPs. We like America and the cachet that comes from being a friend, we just don't want to be THE friend anymore. Remember those Blair/Bush love-ins? The back slapping, the lingering looks, the shared belief that God was guiding them personally - pure car-crash TV; nauseating but compulsive viewing.
Whatever your opinions on Cameron, he is not a stupid man. He does not lack judgement, he knows how to read people and situations. So why did he rush the whole vote? I rather wonder whether he actively wanted a way out. By going to the Commons with some intelligence material but not all of it (funny how US Secretary of State John Kerry provided a whole lot more just 2 days later) and lots of tactics but no clear strategy, he was almost inviting a rejection of his motion. Perhaps he wanted to be seen to be doing and saying all the right things to keep Obama onside, while actually maintaining a stance of non-intervention by proxy.
Obama's premise is that military intervention would comprise a few quick surgical strikes to serve as a "shot across the bows" and show Assad that the use of chemical weapons will not be tolerated. Great, but then what? The trouble is with launching any kind of strike is that it doesn't end there and there is no such thing as limited military intervention. That's a bit like saying someone is a 'little bit pregnant'. War, like pregnancy demands to have a beginning, middle and an end. And there will always, always be a lasting legacy to be taken care of.
Rather hilariously it's now the French who are rushing forward to be America's BFF. Anyone remember those 'cheese eating surrender monkeys' jibes from 2003? Or the 'freedom fries' that took the place of French fries in US eateries? How quickly we forget. I don't get the impression that Cameron is feeling remotely threatened by the French and American presidents' sudden closeness, or by Russia's alleged assertion that Britain is a small island that no-one pays any attention to. I reckon that he's (probably rightly) predicting that Syria will go belly up and the further away he is from it, the better to enter the pre-election period of 2014/15.
It's all a gamble. Would military action force the Syrian government to negotiate? Or would it effectively topple Assad thus creating a vacuum and lighting the fuse to the bone-dry tinderbox that is the Sunni, Shi ite, Muslim Brotherhood, Al Qaeda, jihadist cocktail just waiting for the opportunity to control Syria's future? Obama's hope that any attack would form part of a broader strategy to "support rebel forces" and ultimately "allow Syria to free itself", does sound somewhat naïve.
Syria has no credible opposition, there simply isn't an organised, democratic faction ready to step in and take control if Assad goes. That is both the harsh truth and the main stumbling block to any kind of intervention in the murderous, miserable hell-hole that is now Syria.
Wednesday, 4 September 2013
The Super Summer
The other day, Son sidled up to me, "er, Mum, I'm not being funny or anything.." I inwardly sighed, as he often begins conversations in this slightly abstract fashion. Mistaking my silence for rapt attention he continued, "...or trying to be nice on purpose" (eh??), "but this summer has been the best, BEST summer holiday ever. In the world." That nugget safely off his 9 year old chest, he hugged me and wandered off to annoy his sister.
Reader, for once I had to agree, and I was surprised because being stuck at home with the children for six long weeks doesn't always fill me with unbridled joy. In fact in previous years I've looked forward to September with the enthusiasm of a starving person presented with a groaning buffet table; a sort of 'let me at it' mentality. On the first day of term while other mums stand around the playground dabbing their eyes and waving, I can normally be spotted half a mile down the road kicking up my heels and yelling "FREEEEDOM!" at the top of my voice. Because let's face it, six hours of free childcare, five days a week is not to be sniffed at.
This year was different. Sure the amazingly hot, sunny UK weather undoubtedly helped by ensuring that the garden was a go-er every day. But the really big change was that for once, the children's bodyclocks shifted so that when we let them stay up 'til nine or ten o'clock, they actually managed to sleep in until eight or nine the next morning. This has never happened before and I was always left foaming enviously at the mouth at friends who took their kids out to dinner and had to WAKE THEM UP the next morning for breakfast. Ha! Husband and I decided years ago that there was absolutely no upside to keeping two, tired, crotchety kids up for a nice supper en famille because a) they'd give us indigestion and b) stubbornly wake us up at the crack of sparrows for no good reason and then be miserable again all day because they hadn't had enough sleep.
But what a result; halfway through our two weeks in Spain, Husband and I realised that that unfamiliar, wide-eyed feeling we were experiencing each morning was a direct result of having had enough sleep! So for that we were grateful in the extreme and gazed upon our offspring with newly affectionate and appreciative eyes.
Another reason it was a good holiday is that Husband didn't disappoint in his quest to provide at least one, hilarious, never-to-be-forgotten moment for each foreign trip we take. The kids (with my encouragement) have wised up to this and are alert, spaniel-like, for when daddy does something strange/dangerous/plain daft which will provide us with many hours of glee.
A few holidays ago in Spain, Husband took it upon himself to save the life of a little boy in the local swimming pool. It was magnificent. He leaped off the sun lounger with surprising athleticism, peeled off his t-shirt and shouted "don't worry Charlie" (for that was the victim's name) "I'm coming!" thus ensuring that everyone around the pool turned to look. He executed a racing dive of which Ellie Simmonds would be proud, and determinedly front-crawled to the little chap in the middle of the deep end and heroically dragged him to the side. Oh bravo, I hear you say. The only trouble was, the little boy wasn't drowning at all, simply playing a drowning 'game', of which everyone, apart from Husband, had been aware. Husband became known as The Hoff after that.
The next year, while holidaying in the same part of Spain, we took our visiting friends to the local bull running as it was fiesta week in the village. It's not quite on the scale of Pamplona but the premise is still the same. Barriers are erected either side of the main street and the hapless bulls are let out of their trailer to run up and down while 'brave' men leap out in front of them and scurry back behind the barriers for safety. I always feel sorry for the bulls because while they're not actually harmed in any way, only poked and prodded, it still makes me incredulous that this passes for entertainment in modern-day Spain.
Anyway, Husband decided to slip through the railings while the bulls were safely at the far end of the street (or so he thought) to take a photo of the whole spectacle. Sadly while he was fiddling around with the camera, one of the smaller and more nimble bulls (still sporting a massive pair of horns mind you) made a sudden dash for our end which made all the 'brave men' leap as if one, in the direction of safety. Husband was caught unawares and came crashing backwards through the barriers and landed, on his back, on top of the camera, our kids and our friends' kids. It provided much amusement for the rest of the holiday as the kids took turns to act out the scene, one playing the part of the bull, one being Husband, or El Matador, as we were now calling him.
This year, just to add variety, all the drama took place out at sea. "We'll go sailing!" decided Husband, "the kids are both strong swimmers now and I used to love my sailing!". So this being Spain, we were able to rock up to a marina and hire a Hobie cat (for the uninitiated that's a small twin catamaran with sails) just like that. No proof was required of address, damage deposit, ability to sail... we just grabbed a few life jackets and off we went. How refreshing I thought as we bobbed through the harbour. In the UK you'd be made to go on a course, sign a waiver and watch a 45 minute safety DVD before even being allowed to THINK about renting a boat!
Hanging over the side looking at the pretty fish, my reverie was interrupted by Husband suddenly yelling "Senor! Senor! Can you help us!!" Yes, we were still in the harbour and heading merrily towards the rocks. Turns out there wasn't quite enough wind and Husband hadn't sailed one of these for, oooooh, about 17 years so the finer points of steering the thing had momentarily escaped him. Thankfully the nice Spanish man paddled over and climbed aboard and somehow got us heading out to sea.
Of course by this time, Daughter, who was a bit nervous about the whole venture anyway, was sobbing uncontrollably and pleading with Daddy to please take us back. "Well!" I said brightly "this is FUN!" Contrary to all expectations we didn't die a watery death and once Husband's memory had returned we had quite a jolly little sail. Daughter eventually stopped crying enough to open her eyes and Son had a fine time operating the front sail. Husband's name after that one was El Capitan.
So now the holiday is over and we're back to the old routine which is both a comfort and a chore. It's been a revelation to me that being with the kids for so long can actually be a fairly pleasant experience. I'm now quite looking forward to the October half term.....!
Reader, for once I had to agree, and I was surprised because being stuck at home with the children for six long weeks doesn't always fill me with unbridled joy. In fact in previous years I've looked forward to September with the enthusiasm of a starving person presented with a groaning buffet table; a sort of 'let me at it' mentality. On the first day of term while other mums stand around the playground dabbing their eyes and waving, I can normally be spotted half a mile down the road kicking up my heels and yelling "FREEEEDOM!" at the top of my voice. Because let's face it, six hours of free childcare, five days a week is not to be sniffed at.
This year was different. Sure the amazingly hot, sunny UK weather undoubtedly helped by ensuring that the garden was a go-er every day. But the really big change was that for once, the children's bodyclocks shifted so that when we let them stay up 'til nine or ten o'clock, they actually managed to sleep in until eight or nine the next morning. This has never happened before and I was always left foaming enviously at the mouth at friends who took their kids out to dinner and had to WAKE THEM UP the next morning for breakfast. Ha! Husband and I decided years ago that there was absolutely no upside to keeping two, tired, crotchety kids up for a nice supper en famille because a) they'd give us indigestion and b) stubbornly wake us up at the crack of sparrows for no good reason and then be miserable again all day because they hadn't had enough sleep.
But what a result; halfway through our two weeks in Spain, Husband and I realised that that unfamiliar, wide-eyed feeling we were experiencing each morning was a direct result of having had enough sleep! So for that we were grateful in the extreme and gazed upon our offspring with newly affectionate and appreciative eyes.
Another reason it was a good holiday is that Husband didn't disappoint in his quest to provide at least one, hilarious, never-to-be-forgotten moment for each foreign trip we take. The kids (with my encouragement) have wised up to this and are alert, spaniel-like, for when daddy does something strange/dangerous/plain daft which will provide us with many hours of glee.
A few holidays ago in Spain, Husband took it upon himself to save the life of a little boy in the local swimming pool. It was magnificent. He leaped off the sun lounger with surprising athleticism, peeled off his t-shirt and shouted "don't worry Charlie" (for that was the victim's name) "I'm coming!" thus ensuring that everyone around the pool turned to look. He executed a racing dive of which Ellie Simmonds would be proud, and determinedly front-crawled to the little chap in the middle of the deep end and heroically dragged him to the side. Oh bravo, I hear you say. The only trouble was, the little boy wasn't drowning at all, simply playing a drowning 'game', of which everyone, apart from Husband, had been aware. Husband became known as The Hoff after that.
The next year, while holidaying in the same part of Spain, we took our visiting friends to the local bull running as it was fiesta week in the village. It's not quite on the scale of Pamplona but the premise is still the same. Barriers are erected either side of the main street and the hapless bulls are let out of their trailer to run up and down while 'brave' men leap out in front of them and scurry back behind the barriers for safety. I always feel sorry for the bulls because while they're not actually harmed in any way, only poked and prodded, it still makes me incredulous that this passes for entertainment in modern-day Spain.
Anyway, Husband decided to slip through the railings while the bulls were safely at the far end of the street (or so he thought) to take a photo of the whole spectacle. Sadly while he was fiddling around with the camera, one of the smaller and more nimble bulls (still sporting a massive pair of horns mind you) made a sudden dash for our end which made all the 'brave men' leap as if one, in the direction of safety. Husband was caught unawares and came crashing backwards through the barriers and landed, on his back, on top of the camera, our kids and our friends' kids. It provided much amusement for the rest of the holiday as the kids took turns to act out the scene, one playing the part of the bull, one being Husband, or El Matador, as we were now calling him.
This year, just to add variety, all the drama took place out at sea. "We'll go sailing!" decided Husband, "the kids are both strong swimmers now and I used to love my sailing!". So this being Spain, we were able to rock up to a marina and hire a Hobie cat (for the uninitiated that's a small twin catamaran with sails) just like that. No proof was required of address, damage deposit, ability to sail... we just grabbed a few life jackets and off we went. How refreshing I thought as we bobbed through the harbour. In the UK you'd be made to go on a course, sign a waiver and watch a 45 minute safety DVD before even being allowed to THINK about renting a boat!
Hanging over the side looking at the pretty fish, my reverie was interrupted by Husband suddenly yelling "Senor! Senor! Can you help us!!" Yes, we were still in the harbour and heading merrily towards the rocks. Turns out there wasn't quite enough wind and Husband hadn't sailed one of these for, oooooh, about 17 years so the finer points of steering the thing had momentarily escaped him. Thankfully the nice Spanish man paddled over and climbed aboard and somehow got us heading out to sea.
Of course by this time, Daughter, who was a bit nervous about the whole venture anyway, was sobbing uncontrollably and pleading with Daddy to please take us back. "Well!" I said brightly "this is FUN!" Contrary to all expectations we didn't die a watery death and once Husband's memory had returned we had quite a jolly little sail. Daughter eventually stopped crying enough to open her eyes and Son had a fine time operating the front sail. Husband's name after that one was El Capitan.
So now the holiday is over and we're back to the old routine which is both a comfort and a chore. It's been a revelation to me that being with the kids for so long can actually be a fairly pleasant experience. I'm now quite looking forward to the October half term.....!
Monday, 22 July 2013
Beauty and the Beast
I wish I could say that I hold an
unrivalled place in Husband’s affections.
That I was his one and only true love, that my chassis was classy enough
to make him stop and stare. But I have a
rival. She’s a few years younger than me
too, just to rub salt in the wound. We do
have quite a few things in common; a somewhat unpredictable nature, we both
require a fair bit of love and attention when the going gets tough and over the
years he’s spent a small fortune keeping us both happy. I know that he loves me, sure, but HER? Well, he adores her. The kids do too.
I used to curl my lip whenever she was
mentioned or Husband needed (or wanted, more like) to spend time with her. He
says “I’ll only be gone about an hour”. It’s always, always longer. “She’s
complicated” he protests when I dare to grumble. She’s completely unreliable
too, I’ve lost count of the number of times she’s let him down. I always refer to her as ‘The Beast’ and try
to have as little to do with her as possible.
Recently The Beast and I have been sort of
thrown together. We’ve been forced to find a way of getting along. Husband’s new job has meant that he needs a
decent car to get round the M25 – the cue for him to take my lovely motor and
disappear off into the sunrise every day.
You’ve probably guessed by now that The Beast is a mechanical rival;
she’s a rather old Land Rover, a bone shaker of the highest order.
Sometimes she starts, sometimes she simply
can’t be bothered. Either way she emits
a big puff of blue smoke, a sort of ‘Gallic shrug’, you know like the Parisians
whenever you dare to complain about anything.
Even if she is minded to start, it doesn’t mean she’ll keep going, oh
no. Last week she had a funny turn at
the Bat & Ball traffic lights so I was forced into a kind of hot shoe
shuffle as my feet darted between brake, clutch and accelerator while my hand frantically
worked the ancient, upright handbrake like I was drawing water from a pump in a
drought. Happy days.
But oh my goodness does she draw
attention! Chugging along I suddenly
become aware of many eyes upon me which I always put down to the ghastly noise
she makes. Small children stop and point
and wave, sometimes their dads join in too (yes always the dads, never the
mums). The other day I was halfway up
the high street when another Landie, a tad shinier than The Beast, was coming in
the opposite direction. As it drew
closer I saw the (rather fit) bloke driving it raise just his index finger off
the steering wheel in a kind of clandestine salute. Not the whole hand, just
the finger. I felt compelled, as if by some unseen force, to raise my finger in
return. I did. He nodded, almost
imperceptibly, I nodded and we carried on in our separate directions. I have a feeling that should The Beast decide
to really ruin my day and properly break down, I wouldn’t be stranded for
long….
But just as I was starting to feel a tiny
bit of affection towards her and was busily making plans for our next outing,
we very nearly came a cropper. I’d asked Husband which one of the three coloured
levers I would use to put her into overdrive so that an exhilarating top speed
of approximately 49mph might be reached.
I’ve seen him do it a thousand times and he did start to explain very
clearly but Reader, to be honest in those 25 seconds my irreverent brain had
skipped onto a completely different subject and I must confess I didn’t really
listen properly. I was probably thinking
that I really must take those sheets out of the tumble dryer before they got
all creased up. Or something like that.
Anyway the next day, trundling along, I
eyed the three knobs warily. Hmmmm, now
what did he say again? Probably not the
yellow one, as that has something about 4-wheel drive written on it. I dredged the depths of my memory and
recalled him saying something along the lines of I would have to reach quite
far forward to engage it. So it can’t be
the black one then as that’s up near the gearstick. Right, it must be the RED one all the way
down there! I ease her into 4th
gear on a nice straight bit of road and the familiar whining noise increases as
we build up a bit of speed. I reach down
and give the red knob a firm push.
JEEEEEEZUSSSSS. The noise is like nothing on earth; a deafening
combination of crashing, grinding, thrashing, grating metal on metal, the lever
bucks angrily against my hand. I’m sure
I can see actual sparks flying.
My panicked eyes flick up, we’re still
travelling forwards. Maybe I didn’t push
it firmly enough? I try again.
NOOOO! Wrong decision. Even more of a racket than before. The Beast
is telling me very firmly that I have selected the wrong lever and will I
please leave off. The sweat of fear is
now prickling my armpits. I tentatively press the throttle, the engine races
but clearly there is now nothing connecting that to the motion of the vehicle,
I have lost all transmission. What have
I done? Thankfully there’s a layby
coming up, I indicate and glide to a halt.
Lifting my sweaty, shaking palms from the steering wheel I gently nudge
the red lever back to where it was and after a few gulps of fresh air, recover
my wits enough to carry on, alert for the possible smell of burning which
thankfully doesn’t come.
Husband’s reaction when I tell him later on
is so distressing it’s almost comical.
He sits, head in his hands, ashen faced; “you pushed the RED one? As you were going ALONG? You could have broken
her” (yeah thanks, not me, her – but I don’t say this out loud) “what were you thinking? I SAID the black one…blah blah..” and so
it went on. Reader don’t get me wrong, I
was truly sorry that my inattention almost resulted in a ruined gearbox, and I
am eternally thankful to The Beast that she kept on going and didn’t leave me
high and dry with a massive problem to fix.
In fact the past month has made me reconsider.
I started off thinking that if she was The Beast then I must be the beauty, but
now I’m not so sure. It’s she that is strong, seemingly unbreakable and
entirely loved by our family. It is she
that all the children’s friends want a lift home in. It’s she that draws
admiring and wondering looks everywhere she goes. She takes whatever we throw at her, be it
muddy bikes, bits of furniture or rubbish for the tip and just keeps on
chugging along. But if she’s actually
the beauty, then oh dear, what does that make me?
Waity Katy
I feel for the Duchess of Cambridge I
really do. I mean it’s bad enough being
heavily pregnant in the middle of a sudden and rather unexpected heatwave. But to have the eyes of the world fixed
beadily, figuratively speaking, upon your cervix, well it must add a whole heap
of extra stress to the mix. I’ll be
amazed if the royal cervix in question actually manages to overcome what must
be an almost paralyzing intensity of focus and manages to dilate in the proper
fashion instead of yelling ‘that’s it I’m outta here!’ before slapping itself shut and running for the hills.
The poor woman had to endure endless press
speculation during her and William’s long courtship about ‘would they, wouldn’t
they’ ever tie the knot which earned her the somewhat dubious moniker ‘Waity
Katy’. They duly got engaged, to
collective gasps of ‘isn’t she posh?’
‘isn’t she too thin?’ etc etc as soon as she opened her mouth. The wedding bells had barely finished pealing
when the speculation about when they might breed began doing the rounds.
Her violent and sudden hyperemesis gravidarum
(that’s extra crappy morning sickness to you and me) kind of let the cat out of
the bag and they were forced to go public early, to a drooling media camped
outside the King Edward VII hospital day and night.
As I write this, I have the pleasure (is
that the correct word?) of being on call for the BBC for when Kate finally
shows a glimpse of being in labour. When
we get the merest whiff of a contraction it’s all systems go and I’ll be one of
many journalists camped outside either the hospital in Paddington, Buckingham
Palace or Kensington Palace for hours, possibly days on end. Just like going into labour oneself, it
promises to be long, grueling, uncertain and sweaty. I don’t know about Kate but I reckon we’ll
all be needing a bit of gas and air to get us through.
In the newsroom just now, it’s a sort of
collective lingering, watching, trying to go about everyday business, calm-before-the-storm
atmosphere as plans are checked, tweaked and endlessly discussed. It reminds me of waiting to give birth to my
first born. I went overdue by two full
weeks and basically if Kate does that then we’re all stuffed, as the end of
term is fast approaching and the working mums who are essentially the glue
holding BBC News together have mostly booked annual leave to be with their own
sprogs.
In my own two weeks of confinement (well
actually it was more like a whole month because of course you daren’t actually
go anywhere leading up to your due date either!) I mostly sat on my backside,
swollen ankles elevated, eating giant bars of chocolate and imploring various
friends and relatives to nip to the chip shop on their way home and bring me my
usual. I would, occasionally venture
from sofa to kitchen to garden then back to sofa. God I was bored. I even began to welcome those annoying calls
from well-meaning friends asking if there’s ‘any news yet’. NO! I’m still sat here the size of a flipping
whale just like I was the last time you asked.
When it finally happened and I felt the
first odd twinges of a contraction, I kind of dismissed it and didn’t even tell
Husband as he left for work that morning.
I did some gardening before huffing and puffing my way around Tescos,
alarming the poor checkout lady as I wheezed through a contraction and carried
on packing my shopping, an odd assortment of cat food, a marrow and a lightbulb
if I remember correctly. Labour had been
so elusive I really could not believe it was actually happening.
So now I’m sharing Kate’s confinement in
that I daren’t go anywhere too far from London.
We’re all sharing William’s burden of attempting to go about every day
life while jumping every time the phone beeps. I’m making tentative plans with
friends, school mums for end-of-term coffee and the hairdresser, but on the
understanding that I may well cancel at the last minute if the balloon goes
up. Come on Kate love, eat some
pineapple, have a curry, get William back down south for, ahem, that other
activity that is meant to bring on labour (or do the royals have staff for that
kind of thing?), please get on with it before the kids break up!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
