What are we doing?

Is it April 1st?  I had to wonder when I heard on the news this morning that Facebook has decided to allow videos of people being beheaded to be shown on its site.  I did the aural equivalent of a double take and turned up the radio, convinced that I must have misheard.  But no, sadly everything I heard was accurate.

Apparently Facebook did have a temporary ruling in place that blocked the showing of such scenes, but has decided to allow these decapitation videos again (or snuff movies as they used to be called) so that users can "be free to watch and condemn such content".

Laudable or laughable or just downright bonkers?  Have we become so immune to inhumanity, suffering and torture that we think it's somehow OK for it to be streamed on a social media site where most people turn for a bit of light gossip and a few holiday snaps?  Do we not believe that if children or vulnerable people have access to such sites then the content should be monitored?

What is wrong with this situation?  Er...quite a lot actually.  PM David Cameron has stepped into the fray branding Facebook "irresponsible" and saying it needs to "explain its actions" to worried parents.  I'm sorry but I don't want some spotty 21-yr-old FB employee "explaining" to me why he or she thinks I need to be able to view such content so that I have the "freedom" to  condemn it.

Why do we need to witness something in order to condemn it?  I know that paedophilia is abhorrent.  I do not need to see it in action to have that confirmed.  I also know that someone having their head cut off is indicative of an unlawful and not-very-pleasant situation and although it may pass for accepted retribution in some parts of the world, I do not need to see it to realise that it must be condemned.

The internet is a wonderful tool but its major downside is that it allows people, sat on their behinds in their own living rooms, to see stuff without any effort on their part whatsoever.  In the past if you had a strange urge to experience another culture in which decapitation was the norm, some effort would have been required.  You would have had to do some fairly detailed research to discover where this sort of practice took place.  Then you would have worked out how to get there arranging visas, vaccinations etc.  Then you would have had to earn (yes earn through having a job) the money and taken the time off to travel.  Once in situ you would  have (hopefully) gained some understanding of the country and its people, and then if you were "lucky" enough to witness the desired decapitation, it would have been horrific but at least you would have been able to put it into some sort of context.

But some numpty who's taken time off in between gaming and ordering pizza to surf the internet looking for weird stuff?  How is that right that they should be able to view something as deeply disturbing as the film that supposedly drew attention to Facebook's decision which was of a masked man murdering a woman, possibly in Mexico.  Nice.

This whole debate is symptomatic of the society we live in where some people think it's acceptable to film episodes on their mobiles and post them onto Facebook and other sites purely for the amusement of complete strangers.  It's voyeurism of the worst kind and it's happening all the time.  At one end of the spectrum there's the teen who points their phone over the cubicle door and snaps their mate on the loo, and at the other, the gang rape of a drunk girl.  There is little awareness from individuals who do this of the effect that it may have on the person being filmed.

We also seem to have conveniently forgotten that there are large numbers of primary school age children out there who (unbelievably) have a Facebook account.  There is supposed to be an age limit of 13 (still babies really) to set one up but I personally know of several much younger Facebookers.  Why they are allowed by their parents to set up an account I do not know, perhaps in some cases the parents simply aren't aware.  But as I'm always banging on to my own kids who, you will not be surprised to discover, DON'T have anything to do with FB (!) once you've seen something horrible you cannot 'unsee' it; it's imprinted on your brain forever.

Come on Facebook, show some initiative and take a stand against such vileness being streamed through your site.  I've said before that while I am very much anti-censorship I am also totally pro-child protection and sometimes we so need to sacrifice our "rights" to be all seeing in order to protect those who can't protect themselves.

I predict a diet

Calories - 1900 (oh poo), exercise - none (bah), alcohol consumed - lost count (oops).  Yes I have been making like Bridget J recently and jotting down all the little things that when put together, go towards making up the bigger picture.

Reader, just two weeks ago I stepped on the scales and almost fainted.  The digits that flashed before my sleepy eyes came as a shock.  In effect about twelve pounds of extra flab have crept slowly and silently onto my frame over the past year, resulting in straining seams and a general feeling that all is not as it should be.

I'd been aware for a few months that clothes were feeling a bit on the tight side, especially around the midriff, but I put it to the back of my mind, assuming that all would right itself once the summer was over and I had more time to exercise.

But no, it is not as simple as that.  It would appear that after four weeks of slugging it out, every week day at a mixture of circuits, aerobics, taekwondo, kick-fit and total body workout (like circuits but harder!), the weight is simply not shifting. The flab is more toned but it's still there; the clothes are still not fitting. Which is a complete pain as it means that I now am looking at the dreaded calorie counting, or in other words - a diet.

God how I detest having to think about every damn morsel I put in my mouth.  I'm much more used to being so active that it doesn't matter a jot what I eat or drink, a much more satisfying state of affairs but one that is seemingly temporarily (or so I hope) unavailable to me.

It makes me ponder on whether I'd rather be a) stressed out but thin, or b) happy but plump. It's a tough one to call.  Clearly life is just a bit too comfortable just now (poor little me eh?) So today I started a secret food diary (secret in that I never talk about 'dieting' or being unhappy with my body in front of the kids) into which I aim to note everything that passes my lips to see exactly what I'm doing wrong.  Thank God for the internet.  I can simply Google "how many calories in half an avocado" - 133 in case you were interested - and fill in the little column and add up as I go along. Riveting.

So I'm an adult, with forty-odd years of yo-yoing up and down between the dress sizes which I regard as a minor nuisance but not earthshattering.  My self-confidence and esteem are generally high and while I might hate the muffin top, I love the person underneath it. But how do you deal with a 7-year old girl who is also overweight?

Yes it's Daughter.  My wonderful, funny, clever, beautiful little girl has been overweight for about 2 years now and it's getting to the stage where it's a struggle to get clothes to fit.  At the beginning of term I happened to be in BHS in Oxford St and noticed that they do a school uniform range in a 'generous' fit.  I was simultaneously repulsed and relieved.  I quickly bought her a pair of these trousers and was then sad but relieved that they fitted.

Last September we had real problems trying to get skirts and trousers to fit.  We traipsed around the shops, trying on larger and larger sizes, but she's only little and the age 8-9 clothes just about did up round the waist, but of course swamped her everywhere else.  Until that point I'd kind of ignored the weight, putting it down to puppy fat that would simply melt away when she grew a bit, I felt really uncomfortable about the prospect of putting a, then 6-yr-old, on a diet.  I personally know of a woman who died, just a few years ago from anorexia which in turn stemmed from childhood weight issues. I absolutely LOATHE the current thin obsession and would much rather focus on being fit and strong, with a healthy weight a convenient side effect.

On that shopping trip I was almost in tears in John Lewis, struggling to get a pair of school trousers done up, I suddenly decided that enough was enough and my continued ignoring of the issue was tantamount to child neglect.  At home we sat down and had a talk about healthy eating, exercise and all of the family needing to reduce our 'jelly-bellies' that had crept on over the summer.  "But not ME!" son helpfully shouted from his bedroom, "I don't have a jelly-belly!".  No darling, not you (through gritted teeth, trying to keep it all light and non-judgemental).

So we decided that as pretty much everything we ate at home was healthy, and that she did lots of daily exercise (PE, taekwondo, swimming, gymnastics, trampolining in the garden, scootering to school), the only thing she could alter was what she ate at school, most specifically the puddings. I look at their school lunch menu from time to time and shake my head in wonder that the school has a 'no chocolate' policy for the packed lunch brigade, but thinks nothing of serving up sticky toffee pudding, jam doughnuts, apple crumble and custard, caramel shortbread every single day.  Empty calories, as my mother would say.

So bless her, last year she agreed that as she would like her clothes to fit better, she would have pudding only twice a week, and the other 3 days would opt for a yoghurt or fruit.  Reader, the difference was immediately noticeable.  Her sticky-out tummy became more streamlined and she began to look like the other little girls again.  But just recently I've noticed that it's happening again.  We bought a (larger size) dress on Saturday for a dance competition and it wouldn't do up.  Oh dear.  I got that sick feeling, a mixture of guilt (that I'd let it creep on again), desperation (am I doing the right thing by making it an issue?), fear (of triggering some sort of eating disorder) and downright weariness - here we go again.

It transpires that at school she has returned to eating a pudding every day, just like her dad (in a crisis blame him) if a pudding is in front of her and a queue of people behind, she simply cannot resist.  So as from today, we're trying packed lunches which thank goodness, she is really keen on and at the moment, I have time to make.  If we can control the calorie intake, surely the weight will disappear?  There's been a big 'push' recently by the NHS highlighting the problems caused by childhood obesity; they're calling it the 'foremost public health threat currently facing the youth of this nation'.  Children, like my daughter, who carry excess weight in their early years are much more at risk of developing type 2 diabetes, high blood-fat levels, liver disease, joint and mobility problems and some cancers as they get older.

Reader I sincerely hope the packed lunches make a difference, otherwise we'll have to get the doctors involved then it really will become an 'issue'.

Tonight Matthew, I'm going to be......

I'm sure I'm not alone in adopting many different roles as I trot along in life trying to figure out what it's all about and how best to stay sane(ish).  I've been 'dynamic mum' (come on kids!  let's do a page from your work books every day during the holidays and we'll go swimming and cycling every day too!); that one never lasts long. 

For many years I was 'career girl' which was fabulous until I found myself being pulled every which way by the demands of motherhood and it came down to the simple fact that something had to go; kids or career.  It was a close call.

I'm often 'caring friend', sharing and listening to woes, hopes and dreams.  'Party girl' I have had to scale back a tiny bit as it's taking me longer and longer to recover but I'm bravely working up to the coming Christmas period so that she can have quite a few well deserved outings.  I'm sometimes 'seductive wife', well ok, only on birthdays and special occasions - Reader, it would never do to spoil him.

During September I have mostly been, entirely of my own volition, 'perfect wife and mother', yep it's a totally new one on me too.  Basically I've chosen not to accept any paid work and have instead concentrated on being around and nurturing my family with love, attention and fresh, home-cooked food EVERY SINGLE DAY.

This unusual (for me) situation came about as a result of several factors, Husband's new job which means that during the week he is largely absent from family life, being one of them.  Son is also now in Year 5, which will mean little to those of you who have very young ones or are child-free, but to those in the know, it's a pretty tough academic year for those poor little 9-year-olds with tutoring, homework and expectations piled on daily.

I've also been busy designing and drawing up plans for our Big House Project which is a sizeable extension and remodelling of existing rooms.  I love the creative and mathematical process of measuring and drawing but blimey it's hard work.  I console myself with the knowledge that while I may not be earning, I'm sure as heck saving us a whole heap of money in architect's fees.  Plus I can fiddle around to my heart's content, drawing and re-drawing until I've predicted to the nth degree, how we will want to live for the next umpteen years.

But the whole wrap around nurturing, caring wife/mother role is one that doesn't come easily.  I don't feel particularly privileged when anyone needs me on a regular basis, I feel trapped. I enjoy variety and have always been able to flit about doing lots of different things in the course of a day or week, and I'm also accustomed to receiving money and praise for my efforts. 

When you're in the home all day every day, the pay and conditions are crap. In my experience nobody particularly thanks you or even notices that you've emptied the dishwasher (again) or tidied up inside that cupboard so that the door will actually shut.  I find myself pointing out these small, mind-numbing tasks to anyone who will listen, which is often just the cats.

There are some perks of course.  I have been able to exercise properly every day of September, reprising my 'fitness queen' role, something that working in London doesn't allow, and I've caught up with copious friends for coffee and lunch, but if I am to be there at the beginning and end of each day for my loved ones with an imaginatively crafted, healthy, nutritious meal in the oven, well, that all takes time.

When I began this I wasn't sure I would be able to keep it up for a whole month and keep a smile on my face too.  But I've surprised myself by taking some pride in my domestic skills and by the effect it seems to have had on the family as a whole.  The kids are enjoying the certainty that Mummy will be there to collect them every night and because my presence is felt, the homework is being done with minimum fuss and bother.

Husband departs each morning safe in the knowledge that he will return home to a calm and happy household.  He keeps mentioning in a duly respectful and grateful tone (he's no fool that one), how much difference this is making to his work/life balance. Damn it! Why did they have to respond so well?  Serious respect to all of you who successfully make this role your own, day in, day out but Reader, despite the obvious advantages to home and happiness I cannot do it forever, something will go bang at some point and it'll probably be me. 

My house plans are complete and about to go in for the council's perusal and I'm beginning to feel that unmistakeable twitch, that thirst for adventure and a change of scene.  I feel another role fast approaching and you can safely put money on that it will have little to do with dishwashers.

What's in a name?

Well quite a lot as it happens, and a recent name-related event has led me to question how far we have come, or rather haven’t come, in the past hundred or so years since the word ‘feminism’ first entered our lexicon. 

My consternation was piqued when two friends recently tied the knot.  They shared over a decade of history and 3 kids, so you could argue that the marriage bit was just a formality. But to them it wasn’t; it meant a heck of a lot, especially as one of them had done it before, only to experience a miserable divorce just a few years later.  So this was the opposite of a rush-job; meticulously planned with every detail given due thought and consideration.

The bride isn’t a Brit so the main ceremony took place in her home town overseas, then they had a wonderful British wedding party so that all their local friends could celebrate with them.  The venue was stunning, the sun shone and the champagne flowed; Reader it was fab and all the guests agreed that everything was pretty perfect.  Until, that is, towards the end of the night when the rumour started circulating that the groom had taken the bride’s surname.

It was a bit like a fart in a lift in that nobody wanted to be the first to mention it.  It fell to a rather inebriated gentleman to bring up the subject which he did in what I thought was a particularly delicate and sensitive manner.  The exchange went something like this:

Pissed bloke: “Oi!  I just heard that you’re changing your name to hers?”

Groom: “That’s right, I am”

PB: “What the **** d’ya want to do something like that for?”

Groom (impressively still sporting an engagingly polite smile): “Well we decided it was easier for one of us to change, ie me, rather than her and all the kids having to change theirs.  It’s no biggie”

PB: “***** me!  Wouldn’t catch me doing something like that – no way!”

Now isn’t that just so supportive?  I must admit we had stolen the march on most of the guests as we'd seen the happy couple just the week before for a pre-wedding celebration (it’s any excuse to pop open a bottle or 3 at our gaff) and they’d told us about the surname decision then.   My reaction had been to say well done, open another bottle of fizz and congratulate them on putting the flagstones on yet another step towards true equality. And I meant every word.

When I got married it didn’t even occur to me to change my surname.  Why would I?  It was part of me, no, not just part of me, it WAS me.  Why would I want to suddenly, at the age of 29, acquire a new identity?  I generously offered to share my surname with my husband-to-be, but he had similar views to mine where his identity was concerned so we just stayed as we were.  We were married, we knew it and all our friends and family knew it.  I viewed it as a simple, personal choice that would be respected by all who knew me, at that time and in the future.

Now I happen to loudly and proudly refer to myself as a feminist and I always have done.  I consider it to be neither a dirty word nor a complicated one.  I believe men and women are equal and should therefore be treated as such. Neither gender should dominate the other, and from the moment of birth, the same opportunities should be open to all including later on, the choice of which name to adopt upon marriage.  My kids will parrot “there’s no such thing as boys’ toys or girls’ colours” because I’ve taught them they can wear what they like and play with what they like.  I’ve never understood why a parent would automatically bar their child from fifty per cent of experiences anyway. Bonkers.

If you struggle with the concept of feminism, then the journalist and author Caitlin Moran neatly sums it up by posing the question: ‘do you have a vagina?’ and ‘do you want to be in control of it?’ and apparently if the answer to both questions is ‘yes’ then congratulations, you are a feminist. Simple huh?  Only it’s not apparently.

My first Christmas as a married woman was a revelation when cards from all our dear friends, many of whom had been at our wedding, began to plop onto the doormat.  Despite everyone being made aware of the fact that I hadn’t changed my name, I would say that about seventy per cent of the cards were stubbornly addressed to Mr & Mrs D.....  Some of them were old fashioned enough to write to Mr & Mrs P D....., thus not only stripping me of my surname, but of my own initial too.  And as we all know, generally speaking who is it that writes most of the Christmas cards?  Yes, the women. 

My new in-laws committed the faux pas too, but somehow I can forgive more easily the older generation their outdated views, but my peers who themselves claimed to be believers in equality?  Much harder to accept, especially when I was happy to respect their choices to take their husband’s surname.  I didn’t feel the need to continually address them by their maiden name just to prove my point. 

At the time I felt irrationally upset by what I saw as our friends’ obstinate reversion to a bygone age where women ‘knew their place’. ‘I’m different! ‘I wanted to shout and yell ‘I make my own rules!  I have my own name!  But I calmed down and came to realise it’s not me, it’s them.  It’s other people who are most disturbed when a woman makes a stand, however small.  And I have some experience of making a stand and refusing to let other people tell me what is and isn’t possible purely because of my gender.

I’ve spent most of my professional life operating in a man’s world, first at Halfords, then inside the Ministry of Defence, then as Defence and Security Producer for the BBC and latterly as a property developer sporting (pink) steel toe capped boots and hardhat, bossing builders around.  At each juncture I’ve had to stand tall and prove my worth and knowledge as men (and occasionally a few women) tried their best to talk over me and ignore what I’ve had to say.  I guess I must be drawn to the challenge but I’ve never yearned to be a man, I love being a woman but being able to choose how I work it.

I’m sure that the less charitable among you are now concluding that I was probably born with a tad too much testosterone or something, but let me assure you that I can rock a skirt/blouse/heels combo and talk kids and home with the best of them.  And no, I don’t shave my face or arms.

Life should be about having the freedom to choose and being true to who you are and I take my hat off to my newly married friends with their new (for him anyway) joint surname and I wish them every happiness.  After all, he’s only doing what women have done for millennia and if we’re all truly equal then where is the quandary?  I don’t see one and neither should you.

Baby Bumps

Remember that feeling of amazement when the Duchess of Cambridge appeared from the innards of the Lindo Wing, proudly clutching her new little baby and looking, to be frank, still pregnant?  I could swear that there was a collective gasp from all of us mothers watching when we clocked that even Kate, perfect, gorgeous, never-puts-a-foot-wrong, fashionista babe with her ever glossy mane and sylph-like figure, was a bit like the rest of us after all.  I bet if she’d been standing at a bus stop, some dopey but well meaning fellow traveller would have offered her a seat.

My own post-partum humiliation was visited upon me as I stood in a queue in Boots buying nipple cream or something just as ghastly.  Husband stood to one side with 5-day-old Son in the pram as I suffered the indignity of the woman at the till asking me when my due date was.  I just remember blurting out “I had it, it’s over there” and pointing numbly at the pushchair.  I don’t really recall much else of that episode but I quite possibly burst into tears.  Up until that point I’d probably been feeling that I was holding it all together remarkably well, having managed to get up, shower, dress and make it out of the house, but that one misguided comment pierced my fragile sense of self like an arrow, such was the overwhelming feeling of failure at my early attempts at motherhood.

Any fears about how Kate might be coping were safely laid to rest when she stepped out for her first royal engagement the other night.  ‘My flippin’ God’ I breathed as I took in her silver, shimmering column dress, high sparkling heels, relatively normal sized boobs and TOTALLY FLAT STOMACH.  She looked, to be frank, like the perfect MILF (look it up) and behaved like a normal, smiley, contented person, not someone who had given birth just 6 weeks previously.  There’s no way on earth that someone would mistakenly offer up their seat on the tube for that!

Which brings me nicely to my second post-partum moment of humiliation (yes you’ve probably guessed that I was on such good terms with my baby-weight that we couldn’t bear to be parted for quite some time), which took place some months after the birth of Daughter.  Son was safely at nursery so I succumbed to requests from my work colleagues to bring the new baby into the office so they could all have a cuddle.

I duly arrived at Television Centre and found my car parking space that a kind friend had organised.  Bundling up Daughter in her pushchair I wound my way down the familiar corridors, past the beloved but grotty tea-bars, feeling the slight apprehension that comes when you haven’t been somewhere for a long time.  I did a quick tour of the vast, open plan BBC newsroom while the going was good, but when feeding time approached I retreated to my old office of the world affairs unit where if she started yelling I knew there was a sound-proof radio booth into which I could scurry.

Daughter was delightedly passed around the world affairs correspondents and producers who all cooed and fussed in the appropriate manner, and to my relief, she managed not to be sick on any of them.  I wondered what I had been so worried about.  I was just getting ready to leave when another, esteemed correspondent who despite being a household name shall, for the purposes of this post, remain anonymous, swept in, fresh from the set of the One o’clock news.  After a quick ‘how are things’ chat, they gestured towards my stomach and coyly (but loudly) asked “so is that baby number 3 in there then?”

Reader, the silence was deafening.  Never have so many computer screens and documents been examined so forensically by so many people, all of whom longing to snigger, all of whom admirably managing not to. But did I crumble?  Did I burst into tears?  Did I heck.  By this time I was quite resigned to the fact that yes, to some I probably did still look a bit pregnant, but with a baby and a toddler to look after, quite frankly it was the least of my worries.  I finished tucking Daughter in and turned to face my accuser. “What, this?” I asked, staring them coolly straight in the eyes “no, I’m just a bit fat”.  And with that I swept out, wearing my dignity like a (maternity sized) cloak.  Reader, even though I say it myself, I was magnificent.

 

Secrets, lies and war

Watching David Cameron trying to whip up support for the possibility of bombing Syria gives me a strong and uncomfortable sense of deja vu.  During the Afghan and Iraq conflicts I was the BBC's Defence Producer, a role which gave me a ringside seat to the political storm and military intervention and aftermath of the two conflicts. Cameron's early recall of Parliament and impassioned speeches, detailing President Assad's many and varied abuses of the Syrian people had more than an echo of Blair 10 years ago, confidently denouncing Saddam and his infamous (and as it so miserably turned out, completely invisible) weapons of mass destruction.

The MPs' rebellion left Cameron defeated and politically impotent, but it made me wonder if our PM wasn't playing a rather clever, longer game.  It was kind of obvious, even to the casual observer, that the UK was not going to be heading into military action in the middle east, to use that phrase so beloved of news correspondents "any time soon".  After the 12 gory years fighting in Afghanistan and the shorter, but no less blood-stained invasion of Iraq, the public is war-weary.  As a nation we simply don't have the stomach for yet another C-17 discharging its cargo of flag-draped coffins at RAF Brize Norton and more recently, RAF Lyneham.

Surely Cameron must have foreseen this?  The fact that he appeared to be working to Obama's timetable would have been doubly off-putting for MPs.  We like America and the cachet that comes from being a friend, we just don't want to be THE friend anymore. Remember those Blair/Bush love-ins?  The back slapping, the lingering looks, the shared belief that God was guiding them personally - pure car-crash TV; nauseating but compulsive viewing.

Whatever your opinions on Cameron, he is not a stupid man.  He does not lack judgement, he knows how to read people and situations.  So why did he rush the whole vote?  I rather wonder whether he actively wanted a way out.  By going to the Commons with some intelligence material but not all of it (funny how US Secretary of State John Kerry provided a whole lot more just 2 days later) and lots of tactics but no clear strategy, he was almost inviting a rejection of his motion.  Perhaps he wanted to be seen to be doing and saying all the right things to keep Obama onside, while actually maintaining a stance of non-intervention by proxy.

Obama's premise is that military intervention would comprise a few quick surgical strikes to serve as a "shot across the bows" and show Assad that the use of chemical weapons will not be tolerated.  Great, but then what? The trouble is with launching any kind of strike is that it doesn't end there and there is no such thing as limited military intervention.  That's a bit like saying someone is a 'little bit pregnant'.  War, like pregnancy demands to have a beginning, middle and an end.  And there will always, always be a lasting legacy to be taken care of.

Rather hilariously it's now the French who are rushing forward to be America's BFF.  Anyone remember those 'cheese eating surrender monkeys' jibes from 2003?  Or the 'freedom fries' that took the place of French fries in US eateries?  How quickly we forget.  I don't get the impression that Cameron is feeling remotely threatened by the French and American presidents' sudden closeness, or by Russia's alleged assertion that Britain is a small island that no-one pays any attention to.  I reckon that he's (probably rightly) predicting that Syria will go belly up and the further away he is from it, the better to enter the pre-election period of 2014/15.

It's all a gamble.  Would military action force the Syrian government to negotiate?  Or would it effectively topple Assad thus creating a vacuum and lighting the fuse to the bone-dry tinderbox that is the Sunni, Shi ite, Muslim Brotherhood, Al Qaeda, jihadist cocktail just waiting for the opportunity to control Syria's future?  Obama's hope that any attack would form part of a broader strategy to "support rebel forces" and ultimately "allow Syria to free itself", does sound somewhat naïve.

Syria has no credible opposition, there simply isn't an organised, democratic faction ready to step in and take control if Assad goes.  That is both the harsh truth and the main stumbling block to any kind of intervention in the murderous, miserable hell-hole that is now Syria.

The Super Summer

The other day, Son sidled up to me, "er, Mum, I'm not being funny or anything.." I inwardly sighed, as he often begins conversations in this slightly abstract fashion.  Mistaking my silence for rapt attention he continued, "...or trying to be nice on purpose" (eh??), "but this summer has been the best, BEST summer holiday ever.  In the world."  That nugget safely off his 9 year old chest, he hugged me and wandered off to annoy his sister.

Reader, for once I had to agree, and I was surprised because being stuck at home with the children for six long weeks doesn't always fill me with unbridled joy.  In fact in previous years I've looked forward to September with the enthusiasm of a starving person presented with a groaning buffet table; a sort of 'let me at it' mentality.  On the first day of term while other mums stand around the playground dabbing their eyes and waving, I can normally be spotted half a mile down the road kicking up my heels and yelling "FREEEEDOM!" at the top of my voice.  Because let's face it, six hours of free childcare, five days a week is not to be sniffed at.

This year was different.  Sure the amazingly hot, sunny UK weather undoubtedly helped by ensuring that the garden was a go-er every day.  But the really big change was that for once, the children's bodyclocks shifted so that when we let them stay up 'til nine or ten o'clock, they actually managed to sleep in until eight or nine the next morning.  This has never happened before and I was always left foaming enviously at the mouth at friends who took their kids out to dinner and had to WAKE THEM UP the next morning for breakfast.  Ha!  Husband and I decided years ago that there was absolutely no upside to keeping two, tired, crotchety kids up for a nice supper en famille because a) they'd give us indigestion and b) stubbornly wake us up at the crack of sparrows for no good reason and then be miserable again all day because they hadn't had enough sleep.

But what a result; halfway through our two weeks in Spain, Husband and I realised that that unfamiliar, wide-eyed feeling we were experiencing each morning was a direct result of having had enough sleep! So for that we were grateful in the extreme and gazed upon our offspring with newly affectionate and appreciative eyes.

Another reason it was a good holiday is that Husband didn't disappoint in his quest to provide at least one, hilarious, never-to-be-forgotten moment for each foreign trip we take.  The kids (with my encouragement) have wised up to this and are alert, spaniel-like, for when daddy does something strange/dangerous/plain daft which will provide us with many hours of glee.

A few holidays ago in Spain, Husband took it upon himself to save the life of a little boy in the local swimming pool.  It was magnificent.  He leaped off the sun lounger with surprising athleticism, peeled off his t-shirt and shouted "don't worry Charlie" (for that was the victim's name) "I'm coming!" thus ensuring that everyone around the pool turned to look.  He executed a racing dive of which Ellie Simmonds would be proud, and determinedly front-crawled to the little chap in the middle of the deep end and heroically dragged him to the side.  Oh bravo, I hear you say.  The only trouble was, the little boy wasn't drowning at all, simply playing a drowning 'game', of which everyone, apart from Husband, had been aware.  Husband became known as The Hoff after that.

The next year, while holidaying in the same part of Spain, we took our visiting friends to the local bull running as it was fiesta week in the village.  It's not quite on the scale of Pamplona but the premise is still the same.  Barriers are erected either side of the main street and the hapless bulls are let out of their trailer to run up and down while 'brave' men leap out in front of them and scurry back behind the barriers for safety. I always feel sorry for the bulls because while they're not actually harmed in any way, only poked and prodded, it still makes me incredulous that this passes for entertainment in modern-day Spain.

Anyway, Husband decided to slip through the railings while the bulls were safely at the far end of the street (or so he thought) to take a photo of the whole spectacle.  Sadly while he was fiddling around with the camera, one of the smaller and more nimble bulls (still sporting a massive pair of horns mind you) made a sudden dash for our end which made all the 'brave men' leap as if one, in the direction of safety.  Husband was caught unawares and came crashing backwards through the barriers and landed, on his back, on top of the camera, our kids and our friends' kids. It provided much amusement for the rest of the holiday as the kids took turns to act out the scene, one playing the part of the bull, one being Husband, or El Matador, as we were now calling him.

This year, just to add variety, all the drama took place out at sea.  "We'll go sailing!" decided Husband, "the kids are both strong swimmers now and I used to love my sailing!".  So this being Spain, we were able to rock up to a marina and hire a Hobie cat (for the uninitiated that's a small twin catamaran with sails) just like that.  No proof was required of address, damage deposit, ability to sail... we just grabbed a few life jackets and off we went.  How refreshing I thought as we bobbed through the harbour.  In the UK you'd be made to go on a course, sign a waiver and watch a 45 minute safety DVD before even being allowed to THINK about renting a boat!

Hanging over the side looking at the pretty fish, my reverie was interrupted by Husband suddenly yelling "Senor! Senor!  Can you help us!!"  Yes, we were still in the harbour and heading merrily towards the rocks.  Turns out there wasn't quite enough wind and Husband hadn't sailed one of these for, oooooh, about 17 years so the finer points of steering the thing had momentarily escaped him.  Thankfully the nice Spanish man paddled over and climbed aboard and somehow got us heading out to sea.

Of course by this time,  Daughter, who was a bit nervous about the whole venture anyway, was sobbing uncontrollably and pleading with Daddy to please take us back.  "Well!"  I said brightly "this is FUN!"  Contrary to all expectations we didn't die a watery death and once Husband's memory had returned we had quite a jolly little sail.  Daughter eventually stopped crying enough to open her eyes and Son had a fine time operating the front sail.  Husband's name after that one was El Capitan.

So now the holiday is over and we're back to the old routine which is both a comfort and a chore.  It's been a revelation to me that being with the kids for so long can actually be a fairly pleasant experience.  I'm now quite looking forward to the October half term.....!